STOCHASTIC CALCULUS 10
Deterministic and Stochastic Models Compared
Deterministic and stochastic models describe the same kinds of systems from different mathematical viewpoints.
The main idea
A deterministic model produces one trajectory for fixed parameters and initial conditions.
A stochastic model produces a distribution of possible trajectories.
1. Deterministic model
Consider
\[ \frac{dX}{dt}=f(X,t), \qquad X(0)=X_0. \]Once \(f\) and \(X_0\) are fixed, the model determines a particular trajectory \(X(t)\), assuming the usual conditions for uniqueness.
2. Stochastic model
A corresponding stochastic model may be
\[ dX_t = a(X_t,t)\,dt + b(X_t,t)\,dW_t. \]Even with the same initial value and parameters, different Brownian paths generate different realisations.
3. Same initial state, different outcomes
For a deterministic model,
\[ X_0 \]leads to one model trajectory.
For a stochastic model,
\[ X_0 \]can lead to
\[ X_t^{(1)}, \quad X_t^{(2)}, \quad X_t^{(3)}, \quad \ldots \]depending on the realised random fluctuations.
4. What does a deterministic trajectory represent?
A deterministic trajectory describes the evolution implied by the model's rate equations.
In many applications it may be interpreted as a mean-field or large-population approximation, but this interpretation depends on how the model was derived.
It should not automatically be assumed to equal the expectation of a related stochastic model.
5. Why the expectation need not equal the deterministic solution
Suppose
\[ dX_t = a(X_t)\,dt + b(X_t)\,dW_t. \]Taking expectations gives
\[ \frac{d}{dt}E[X_t] = E[a(X_t)]. \]In a nonlinear model,
\[ E[a(X_t)] \]is generally not equal to
\[ a(E[X_t]). \]6. A simple nonlinear example
Suppose
\[ a(X)=X^2. \]Then
\[ \frac{d}{dt}E[X_t] = E[X_t^2]. \]But
\[ E[X_t^2] = \operatorname{Var}(X_t) + (E[X_t])^2. \]Therefore,
\[ \boxed{ \frac{d}{dt}E[X_t] = (E[X_t])^2 + \operatorname{Var}(X_t) } \]so the variance affects the evolution of the mean.
7. Deterministic approximation
If variability is small, one may approximate
\[ E[X_t^2] \approx (E[X_t])^2. \]This produces a deterministic mean-field equation.
But it is an approximation, not an identity.
8. Linear models are simpler
For a linear SDE such as
\[ dX_t = aX_t\,dt + \sigma\,dW_t, \]taking expectations gives
\[ \frac{d}{dt}E[X_t] = aE[X_t]. \]Here the mean obeys the same linear equation as the corresponding deterministic model.
This agreement does not generally extend to nonlinear systems.
9. A useful comparison
The distinction is not simply smooth versus noisy curves.
It is a difference in the mathematical object being modelled.
10. Distribution at a fixed time
In a deterministic model,
\[ X(t) \]is one fixed value.
In a stochastic model,
\[ X_t \]is a random variable with a probability distribution.
That distribution may be summarised by
\[ E[X_t], \] \[ \operatorname{Var}(X_t), \]quantiles and tail probabilities.
11. Diagram
12. Questions a deterministic model can answer
A deterministic model can be useful for questions such as
\[ \text{What is the predicted trajectory?} \] \[ \text{When does the peak occur?} \] \[ \text{How does changing a parameter alter the trajectory?} \]These are often valuable modelling questions.
13. Questions a stochastic model adds
A stochastic model can additionally address
\[ \text{How variable is the peak?} \] \[ \text{What is the probability of exceeding a threshold?} \] \[ \text{What is the probability of early extinction?} \] \[ \text{How uncertain is the event timing?} \]14. Why the average alone can be misleading
Suppose hospital capacity is \(C\).
A stochastic epidemic model may satisfy
\[ E[I_t]If the decision concerns risk of overload, the probability may be more relevant than the mean alone.
15. Example of two models with the same mean
Imagine two stochastic models whose infectious populations have the same expected value:
\[ E[I_t]=1000. \]One might have
\[ \operatorname{SD}(I_t)=20, \]while another has
\[ \operatorname{SD}(I_t)=500. \]Their average behaviour is identical, but their uncertainty and risk profiles are very different.
16. Deterministic models remain useful
The existence of stochastic models does not make deterministic models obsolete.
Deterministic models are often:
\[ \text{simpler to analyse}, \] \[ \text{faster to simulate}, \] \[ \text{easier to interpret}, \]and useful for understanding the underlying mechanism.
17. Stochastic models require more information
A stochastic model needs assumptions about the random structure as well as the deterministic mechanism.
For an SDE, we must specify both
\[ a(X,t) \]and
\[ b(X,t). \]The diffusion term must be scientifically and mathematically justified.
18. Computational cost
A deterministic ODE normally requires one numerical solution for a fixed parameter set.
A stochastic simulation may require thousands of trajectories to estimate a probability accurately.
19. Population size matters
In large populations, individual random events may partly average out, making deterministic approximations useful.
In small populations or near extinction, stochastic effects can be much more important.
Therefore model choice can depend strongly on scale.
20. Early outbreak behaviour
Suppose only a few infectious individuals are present.
A deterministic epidemic model may predict growth whenever the average reproduction mechanism favours infection.
But in a stochastic model, the first few infectious individuals may recover before transmitting.
The outbreak can therefore disappear by chance.
21. Deterministic growth does not guarantee a major outbreak
A positive deterministic growth rate means the expected mechanism favours increase.
It does not imply
\[ P(\text{major outbreak})=1. \]22. Long-run behaviour
Deterministic models often describe equilibria and their stability.
Stochastic models may instead have stationary distributions, extinction probabilities or random fluctuations around deterministic equilibria.
So the idea of long-run behaviour also changes when randomness is introduced.
23. Different forms of stochastic modelling
Stochastic modelling is broader than SDEs.
Other stochastic models include
\[ \text{discrete-time Markov chains}, \] \[ \text{continuous-time Markov chains}, \] \[ \text{jump processes}, \]and
\[ \text{stochastic differential equations}. \]The appropriate choice depends on the nature and scale of the random events.
24. Jump process versus diffusion model
A continuous-time Markov chain can represent individual discrete events such as one infection or one recovery.
An SDE represents continuous-valued random fluctuation.
25. Diffusion approximation
In suitable large-population settings, a jump process can sometimes be approximated by an SDE.
The drift reflects the average event rates, while the diffusion reflects variation generated by those random events.
26. Deterministic limit
Under suitable scaling, stochastic fluctuations may become relatively small as system size increases.
The stochastic model may then approach a deterministic mean-field model.
This gives a mathematical connection between deterministic and stochastic descriptions rather than treating them as unrelated alternatives.
27. Model comparison should depend on the objective
If the goal is to understand the basic mechanism, a deterministic model may be enough.
If the goal is to quantify the chance of an extreme outcome, a stochastic model is often more appropriate.
28. A useful modelling hierarchy
These are different mathematical views of dynamical systems, each useful for different purposes.
29. Main comparison
30. The central idea
Deterministic and stochastic models are not competitors in every situation.
They answer different levels of the same modelling problem.
The important question is not which model is universally better, but which mathematical description is appropriate for the scientific question being asked.